<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Imus scandal prompts debate on &#8220;forgiveness&#8221; in the Information Age</title>
	<link>http://www.matthewbigelow.com/2007/04/13/imus-scandal-prompts-debate-on-forgiveness-in-the-information-age/</link>
	<description>New media, online communities, social networking, travel and anything else that comes to mind...</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewbigelow.com/2007/04/13/imus-scandal-prompts-debate-on-forgiveness-in-the-information-age/#comment-107</link>
		<author>Rob</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.matthewbigelow.com/2007/04/13/imus-scandal-prompts-debate-on-forgiveness-in-the-information-age/#comment-107</guid>
					<description>Right.  A "macaca" moment shouldn't mean any remarks that are offensive -- it should  really apply only to cases like these, where the "mistake" truly does reveal deeper prejudices.  

It's easy to imagine a non-racist person taking a joke too far or saying something offensive without thinking it through.  But that's not the case with Imus (or ex-Sen. George Allen, either).  So it's a good point: It's not about firing anyone who says something offensive.  It should also reveal the speaker's "essential character," and it should be part of a pattern of offensive speech.  

If, like Imus, those conditions are all met, fire the bastard!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right.  A &#8220;macaca&#8221; moment shouldn&#8217;t mean any remarks that are offensive &#8212; it should  really apply only to cases like these, where the &#8220;mistake&#8221; truly does reveal deeper prejudices.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to imagine a non-racist person taking a joke too far or saying something offensive without thinking it through.  But that&#8217;s not the case with Imus (or ex-Sen. George Allen, either).  So it&#8217;s a good point: It&#8217;s not about firing anyone who says something offensive.  It should also reveal the speaker&#8217;s &#8220;essential character,&#8221; and it should be part of a pattern of offensive speech.  </p>
<p>If, like Imus, those conditions are all met, fire the bastard!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
